標題: government dominated [打印本頁] 作者: nrtderwp 時間: 2015-10-29 13:45 標題: government dominated
Telecommunications in Guyana
Broadcast stations: government dominated; the state Fake Hollister Clothes owns and operates two radio stations broadcasting on multiple frequencies capable of reaching the entire country; government limits on licensing of new private radio stations continue to constrain competition (2007).[1]
Licenses and competition: In 2009 the Court of Appeal ruled that the government had an unlawful monopoly on the airwaves and was not adequately Ghd Straighteners Amazon Uk considering radio license applications. In 2011 the government approved applications for Cheap Nike Roshe Womens ten new radio stations, although the process was controversial and lacked transparency. By year's end 2012 only one new Jeremy Scott Shoes Online station had begun operations, and it was closely aligned with the government.[2]
Press freedom: The government Replica Oakley Frogskins Uk controls most radio stations, which limits the dissemination of diverse views and open public discussion. The NGO Reporters Without Borders criticized press freedom in the country in 2012, due largely to its radio broadcasting monopolies.[2]
Radios: 420,000 sets (1997).[dated info]
Broadcast stations: government dominated; the National Communications Network (NCN) TV is state owned; a few private TV stations relay satellite services (2007).[1]
Televisions: 46,000 dets (1997).[dated info]
Censorship: No government imposed restrictions on television stations or suspensions of broadcasts in 2012. The government largely directs advertising to media houses aligned with the governing party. Government officials use libel laws to suppress criticism. A hearing into a 10 million Guyanese dollars ($50,000) libel suit filed by former President Jagdeo in July 2010 against the Kaieteur News publishers, its editor in chief, and one of its columnists began in August 2011 and remained pending at the end of 2012. The law prohibits arbitrary interference with privacy, family, home, or correspondence, and the government generally respects these prohibitions in practice. A 2008 law allows for the interception of communications through a warrant issued by a judge, exceptions being in the case of a national emergency or where approval for a warrant is impracticable due to the urgency of the matter.[2]
