razen circle, then, has its matter in its formula.
As for that out of which as matter they are produced, some things are said, when they have been produced, to be not that but ‘thaten’; e.g. the statue is not gold but golden. And a healthy man Orbelin Pineda Pelipaita is not said to be that from which he has come. The reason is that though a thing comes both from its privation and from its substratum, which we call its matter (e.g. what becomes healthy is both a man and an invalid), it is said to come rather from its privation (e.g. it is from an invalid rather than Nike Air Max 2018 Womens from a man that a healthy subject is produced). And so the healthy subject is not said to he an invalid, but to be a man, and the man is said to be healthy. But as for the things whose privation is obscure and nameless, e.g. in brass the privation of a particular shape or Karim Benzema Pelipaita in bricks and timber the privation of arrangement as a house, the thing is thought to be Jannik Bandowski Pelipaita produced from these materials, as in the former case the healthy man is produced from an invalid. And so, as there also a thing is not said to be that from which it comes, here the statue is not New Zealand Dresi said to be wood but is said by a verbal change to be wooden, not brass but brazen, not gold but golden, and the house is said Lorenzo De Silvestri Pelipaita to be not bricks but bricken (though we should not say without qualification, if we looked at the matter carefully, even that a statue is produced from wood or a house from bricks, because coming to be implies change in that from which a thing comes to be, and not permanence). It is for this reason, then, that we use this way of speaking.
Book VII Chapter 8
Since anything which is produced is produced by something (and this I call the starting-point of the production), and from something (and let this be taken to be not the privation but the matter; for the meaning we Russia Damen attach to this has already been explained), and since something is produced (and this is either a sphere or a circle or whatever else it may chance to be), just as we Everton Pelipaita do not make the substratum (the brass), so we do not Antonio Candreva Pelipaita make the sphere, except incidentally, Danmark Pelipaita because the brazen sphere is a sphere and we make the forme. For to make a ‘this’ is to make a ‘this’ out of the substratum in the full sense of the word. (I mean that to make the brass round is not to make the round or the sphere, but something else, i.e. to produce this form in something different from itself. For if we make the form, we must make it out of something else; for this was assumed. E.g. we make a brazen sphere; and that in the sense that out of this, which is brass, we make this other, which is a sphere.) If, then, we also make the substratum itself, clearly we shall make it in the same way, and the processes of making will regress to infinity. Obviously then the form also, or whatever we ought to call the shape present in the sensible thing, is not produced, nor is there any production of it, nor Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang Pelipaita is the essence produced; for this is Wales that which is made to be in something else either by art or by nature or by some faculty. But that there is a brazen sphere, this links:
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi
http://lawyerzm.com//index.asp |
